Introduction:
This report is about the critical reflection of my proposed artefact and subsequent learning experience during the Inclusive Practice unit. Coming from a technically minded video production background, the luxury of extensive reflection is absent as project timelines are often unforgiving. After taking a different direction in my career by starting a Master’s degree (still currently studying) and teaching at LCC, I am able to take a step back and delve deeper into my practices and how evaluative thinking can help to build a solid foundation to engage with PgCert.
As a Chinese man growing up in post-colonial Hong Kong and then spent a substantial amount of my educational and adult life in the UK (5 years at boarding school and 3 years at Camberwell College of Arts during my BA degree), I have experienced a fair share of casual and intentional racial discrimination. As a man from a foreign middle-class family, the privilege, resources, and hetero-normative views have helped my professional career immensely. Even though my own economical privileges are acknowledged, I still feel as though my ethnicity and cultural back background are treated as an oppressed minority and seen as an antagonizing trigger in discussions about social and political issues. Not only until I reached 30 that certain prejudices against the white capitalist patriarchy started to emerge from within. As a victim of racial bullying from an early age, I felt as though the trauma experienced was not addressed and therefore developed into negative perspectives towards the white authorities and institutions. Nevertheless, these views are only internal and very rarely externalized. In addition to this, the conservative/patriotic opinions expressed by my family back home, I have inherited some problematic thinking towards marginalized groups (especially small minority groups in China or anyone who is not “Chinese”). I feel this is important such recognitions are brought to the table as a citizen working in the UK, I want to surrender my prejudices, challenge discriminatory social norms and develop a more mature empathetic approach to living. In the context of a teaching environment, the need to understand ‘inclusivity’ and to communicate ‘non-violently’ is essential to elevate my critical thinking and teaching practices.
Context:
As mentioned above, approaches in ‘non-violent communication (NVC) are integral to this particular engagement with inclusive practices. Having completed a series of NVC training workshops (still ongoing) with our course teaching staff, its core ideas and techniques are still fresh in my mind. The key 5 points of nonviolence, developed by Marshal Rosenberg, sets the foundation to recognize the needs of oneself and then in turn recognize the needs of others. This empathetic practice can be integrated into the ‘ethos’ of a course and we as a team is constructing a framework in which every student and staff in the cohort to understand. During the training, identifying what ‘violence’ means to us, the students, colleagues and higher-level management is incredibly insightful in delving deeper into what causes such universal components of harm; ‘white supremacy culture. The toxic traits of the patriarchal white man have permeated into our everyday lives therefore it is even more pressing/relevant to adopt an empathetic set of principles when LCC welcomes students multi-cultural and social backgrounds.
I have been formulating a clear case study to link all my experiences, proposed artefact, and NVC training. From my time as a student at Camberwell, I recognized it was important for any international student to be ‘safely’ included in all classroom discussions, briefings, and workshops. My observation and talking to peers at the time is that students, particularly from a Chinese background, find it difficult to articulately express their emotions with confidence with the appropriate vocabulary in English. This mindset tends to discourage Chinese students to seek the most fitting words and speak up if they are confused about the work or simply contributing to class discussions and tutorials; the fear of embarrassment in a predominately white classroom. Therefore, these students find themselves only congregating with students of similar ethnic backgrounds which prevents inclusion and is detrimental to a student’s learning experience. Perhaps this could be an oversight as it does not consider, British-born ethnic groups and students with mental health and learning difficulties. As a result, creating an inclusive and ‘safe’ learning environment requires closer examination in the attitude and language we share in the cohort.
Defining a ‘safe’ educational space:
After exchanging ideas and feedback with my tutor, I was referred to Jennifer Katz’s ‘Universal Design of Learning (UDL) – Engaging students in inclusive learning’. There is an insightful distinction between students’ academic and social engagement in an ‘inclusive’ teaching environment. It states that “…social interactions are observation, but belonging and self-concept require self-report, either through interview or survey.” This contemplation has been persistently apparent when surveys are submitted after each unit. In class, they are engaged, and relatively content with the teaching, and contact time with staff. Nevertheless, the surveys reflect a different story entirely. A good proportion has contradictory and negative feedback about their experience in class. This disconnect highlights the problematic hierarchal approach to teaching and learning in the institution. This is not a pessimistic perspective on what we have done, in fact, the timing of our ‘NVC’ training couldn’t be more apt. To construct a truly inclusive environment, the needs of staff and students must be discussed and clarified. In the case of our recent training session; clarity, recognition, trust, structure, safety, and autonomy are some of the keywords that stood out.
The process of this identification is what is most important here. Over the 2 days, we are given two separate sheets of the vocabulary of ‘feelings’ and ‘needs’ so that we were precise in communicating exactly or as close to how we felt and what we needed. Our trainer prompted us at the beginning, after every exercise, and end of session to ‘check in’ with one another; each person was given 2 minutes to express how they felt and the type of needs that were met or not met, choosing and using the precise words on these sheets. The simple and important act of using motivated/invigorated instead of just ‘happy’ for example, provided the group a much more exact empathetic inventory to understand each other on an emotional level. This approach is also applied in talking about what the course/student/staff needed.
Putting words into action:
Reflecting this back in the context of my proposed artefact and positionality as an educator, the most constructive takeaway from this training is ‘leveling the playing field’ when it comes to language. As mentioned earlier, this language barrier is debilitating and prevents any real meaningful inclusion of students into the course and its teachings. So, this ‘safe’ space needs a cohesive set of vocabulary, provided to students at the start of the 3 years, despite their level of English. When this linguistic boundary is implemented, the ability to empathize and to hear the needs of students can potentially open up exchanges to communicate truthfully and safely.
Practically, this inventory of ‘feelings’ and ‘needs’ will be included in the ‘Collective narrative research workshop’ proposed. Students will be encouraged to incorporate the appropriate vocabulary into the creation of their avatar (see ‘Exercise 04: Get to know a group better’ in the artefact outline). When they are presenting their avatars, their emotions and of the day will (hopefully) be clearer to the listeners in the group, therefore understanding each other better. If this communicative/expressive process is built up through the years, then ideally the potential for empathetic exchanges between staff and students will be improved.
Evaluation and Conclusion:
Due to timing constraints, I am still yet to conduct the proposed workshop and gain tangible feedback from it. Of course, this suggestion of a vocab inventory is just a starting point as these lists of words will need to become second nature to the staff and students. Perhaps a condensed version can be used as a starting point and then eventually expand everyone is used to this way of communicating; students can add their own to an online glossary (on Moodle) so there is a sense of collaborating through this workshop. Also, there are many communication structures that need to be in place. For example; in an empathetic response after a student has openly discussed their feelings and needs, the listener ideally should say ‘as I hear you say that…’, then respond tentatively. This replying sentence helps the speaker and the listener to acknowledge what is being said. Making sure verbal acceptance is expressed is vital to begin creating a safe environment for learning. As a team, we are still figuring out the logistics of implementing this NVC ethos in the cohort. We are thinking of a 2-day boot camp’, where all students are required to attend at a location outside of college. It is our, Art-Direction, version of an orientation day(s).
Looking at this from the perspective of the students, immediate changes in attitude are difficult as there will always be selective engagement. This selective engagement can be caused by external factors such as mental health, difficulties at home, learning difficulties, and language barriers. Until this workshop has been conducted and reviewed by peers or students, it is still a ‘blue-sky thinking concept.
Lastly, my teaching practices will benefit from using a set of universal languages to bring students together for meaningful collaborations. With a background in film-making; sourcing and gathering the appropriate personnel and then maximizing everyone’s skill and talent in an inclusive/safe environment is an essential process. The connection can be drawn here that putting ‘NVC’ practices in context will no doubt help students to learn the suitable attitudes to approach potential collaborators and work cohesively with them to achieve the best work they can.
Bibliography
Buckemaster, Ceri. “Want a different way of doing things? #2”.
http://www.ceribuckmaster.co.uk/2-foundations-of-nvc.html
Katz, Jennifer. “The Three-Block model of universal design for Learning (UDL): Engaging students in inclusive education” . Canadian Journal of Education. January, 2013.
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jennifer-Katz-5/publication/286055447_The_Three-Block_model_of_universal_design_for_learning_UDL_Engaging_students_in_inclusive_education/links/567dfd9f08aebccc4e040983/The-Three-Block-model-of-universal-design-for-lea
Shades of Noir. “Mental Health & Creating Healing”. April 30, 2017.
https://issuu.com/shadesofnoir/docs/mhchtor
Finnigan, Terry and Richards, Aisha. “Retention and attainment in the disciplines: Art and Design”. Advance HE. September 3, 2016.
https://s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/assets.creode.advancehe-document-manager/documents/hea/private/ug_retention_and_attainment_in_art_and_design2_1568037344.pdf
Russeth, Andrew. “With Sign Language and Sound, an Artist Upends Audience Perceptions”. The New York Times. July 9, 2022.
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/09/world/europe/christine-sun-kim-profile.html
Imel, Susan. “Inclusive Adult Learning Environments” (ERIC Digest No. 162). Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse on Adult, Career, and Vocational Education. 1995.
http://www.edpsycinteractive.org/files/adltlrnenv.html
Bailey, Aarony “Am I sad, or just a student?” May 23, 2022.
https://shadesofnoir.org.uk/am-i-sad-or-just-a-student/